{"id":9606,"date":"2022-06-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-06-27T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=9606"},"modified":"2024-09-25T14:16:37","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T13:16:37","slug":"how-to-kill-mary-queen-of-scots","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/06\/28\/how-to-kill-mary-queen-of-scots\/","title":{"rendered":"Execution or murder? Elizabeth I and the problem of how to kill Mary Queen of Scots"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Dr Andrew Thrush<\/a>, editor of our Lords 1558-1603 section<\/a>, discusses the thorny issue that faced Elizabeth I in the wake of the discovery of Mary Queen of Scots\u2019 role in the Babington Plot of 1586…<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 1 February 1587 Sir Francis Walsingham<\/a> and his fellow Secretary of State, William Davison<\/a>, wrote on behalf of Elizabeth I to the privy councillor Sir Amias Paulet<\/a>, one of the gaolers of the deposed Scottish queen, Mary Stuart, who had fled to England more than twenty years earlier and had recently been judged guilty of plotting to overthrow and murder Elizabeth. In this letter \u2013 perhaps the most extraordinary ever to have been written at the behest of an English monarch – Paulet was informed that Elizabeth \u2018doth note in you a lack of that care and zeal of her service that she looketh for at your hands\u2019. The Queen was astonished that though Paulet had been Mary\u2019s gaoler for more than two years, he had not yet, in all that time, \u2018found out some way to shorten the life\u2019 of Mary, whose continued existence posed a very great threat, not only to Elizabeth herself but also to \u2018religion and the public good\u2019. Mary, after all, had made no secret of the fact that she considered herself the rightful Queen of England, or that she desired to return Protestant England to the Catholic faith.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
Sir Amias Paulet (attributed to N. Hilliard) [via Wikimedia]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

For those of us brought up to regard England\u2019s most famous Queen in an heroic light, it is sobering to learn that Elizabeth expressly advocated the murder of her Scottish cousin. However, the murder of royalty was hardly unknown in England, as Edward II, Richard II, Henry VI and the uncrowned Edward V had all been quietly dispatched. Even so, those responsible were normally careful to leave nothing in writing that might incriminate them. In this case, however, Elizabeth felt no such compunction. That is because, in her view, she was not asking Paulet to commit murder. As she observed, Paulet already had \u2018good \u2026 warrant and ground\u2019 for quietly dispatching Mary, because he had taken the Oath of Association of 1584. Formulated in the aftermath of the assassination of the Dutch Protestant leader William the Silent, and given statutory authority by the Parliament of 1584-5, the Oath required all those who took it to eliminate anyone who tried to kill Elizabeth. As Mary had recently been tried and found guilty of conspiring with Anthony Babington and other English Catholics to overthrow and murder Elizabeth, Paulet was duty-bound to end the life of his prisoner without further ado.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unsurprisingly, Paulet did not share Elizabeth\u2019s view of his obligations in respect of the Oath. On receiving the Queen\u2019s rebuke, he penned a response that has become justly famous: \u2018God forbid that I should make such a shipwreck of conscience, or leave so great a blot to my poor posterity, [as] to shed blood without law or warrant\u2019. Elizabeth, though, was furious at Paulet\u2019s refusal to take matters into his own hands. She stormed at \u2018the niceness of those precise fellows who in words would do great things but in deed perform nothing\u2019. As she saw it, Paulet\u2019s dereliction of duty meant that the responsibility for killing Mary now fell to her.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
Mary Queen of Scots (F. Clouet) [via Wikimedia]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Elizabeth\u2019s reluctance to execute Mary was partly informed by a horror of taking direct responsibility for killing a fellow queen and a close relative – Mary was her first cousin once removed. It also owed something to a desire not to play into Mary\u2019s hands by turning her into a Catholic martyr. However, the main reason Elizabeth wished to do away with Mary secretly was that she feared how the news of her involvement in Mary\u2019s death would be received in Paris and Edinburgh. Now that England was at war with Spain, Elizabeth was anxious to avoid antagonizing either France (where Mary was a former queen consort) or Scotland (where Mary was a former queen regnant) by executing a fellow monarch. Were Mary to be killed as a result of private enterprise rather than state action, Elizabeth could hope to assuage the wrath of these foreign powers by blaming her death upon the zeal of one of her subjects. A state execution, on the other hand, seemed to offer Elizabeth little prospect of pleading innocence. It would also provide her enemies with the perfect justification for carrying out further attempts on her own life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Elizabeth\u2019s desire for Mary to be killed secretly was not shared by her chief minister, William Cecil<\/a>, Lord Burghley. This was ironic, to say the least, as Burghley was one of the architects of the Bond of Association, which had authorized the killing of anyone who threatened the life of Elizabeth. Like other members of the Council, Burghley considered it important that Mary should die at the hands of the public executioner. When in November 1586 Parliament prepared a petition urging the Queen to execute Mary, Burghley struck out a long reference to the Bond of Association lest it should encourage Elizabeth to cling to the hope that one of her enterprising subjects would make it unnecessary for her to sign Mary\u2019s death warrant. However, in the short term, Burghley was beating his head against a brick wall, as before the beginning of February 1587, Elizabeth declined to append her signature to the warrant. Even after she did sign it, she decided not to issue the warrant until she had first put pressure on Sir Amias Paulet to take Mary\u2019s life.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
Execution of Mary Queen of Scots: drawing by R. Beale [via Wikimedia]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

What happened next is well known: Burghley and his fellow councillors issued the warrant without the Queen\u2019s knowledge and Mary was executed on 8 February. Elizabeth was livid, because Mary\u2019s death would now, inevitably, be laid at her door. Burghley was temporarily banished from the royal presence, and William Davison was deprived of office, tried, imprisoned and fined. However, for Elizabeth the matter had actually worked out rather well. By acting independently, Burghley and his colleagues had given the Queen what she wanted. Not only had they succeeded in ridding her of the threat posed by Mary, they had also ensured that she could deny direct responsibility for Mary\u2019s death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ADT<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antonia Fraser, <\/em>Mary, Queen of Scots<\/em> (1969)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

J. Wormald, Mary, Queen of Scots: a Study in Failure <\/em>(1988)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of our Lords 1558-1603 section, discusses the thorny issue that faced Elizabeth I in the wake of the discovery of Mary Queen of Scots\u2019 role in the Babington Plot of 1586… On 1 February 1587 Sir Francis Walsingham and his fellow Secretary of State, William Davison, wrote on behalf of Elizabeth I to the privy councillor Sir Amias Paulet, one of … Continue reading Execution or murder? Elizabeth I and the problem of how to kill Mary Queen of Scots<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":214198051,"featured_media":9619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[720013330,103464271,774275564,66026088,774275534],"tags":[30887813,208610046,644040,35890,1242981,113083448,2421789,123735354,5748938],"class_list":["post-9606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-first-elizabethan-age","category-16th-century-history","category-elizabeth-i","category-scottish-history","category-tudor","tag-babington-plot","tag-bond-of-association","tag-elizabeth-i","tag-featured","tag-mary-queen-of-scots","tag-sir-amias-paulet","tag-sir-francis-walsingham","tag-william-cecil-lord-burghley","tag-william-davison"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/francois_clouet_-_mary_queen_of_scots_1542-87_-_google_art_project-1.jpg?fit=2082%2C3216&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-2uW","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10420,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/11\/24\/elizabeth-is-attitude-towards-the-parliament-of-1586-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":9606,"position":0},"title":"The \u2018Answer Answerless\u2019 and Elizabeth I\u2019s attitude towards the Parliament of 1586-7","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"November 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the latest blog from our First Elizabethan Age series Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of our Lords 1558-1603 section, discusses the words- or lack of- given by Elizabeth I on this day 1586, and some of the more unusual features of the monarch's sixth Parliament... At Richmond Palace on 24\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/fea-at-richmond-palace-a.-wyngaerde-1562-detail.jpg?fit=1200%2C665&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/fea-at-richmond-palace-a.-wyngaerde-1562-detail.jpg?fit=1200%2C665&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/fea-at-richmond-palace-a.-wyngaerde-1562-detail.jpg?fit=1200%2C665&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/fea-at-richmond-palace-a.-wyngaerde-1562-detail.jpg?fit=1200%2C665&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/fea-at-richmond-palace-a.-wyngaerde-1562-detail.jpg?fit=1200%2C665&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":11847,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/08\/24\/what-if-elizabeth-i-had-died-in-1562\/","url_meta":{"origin":9606,"position":1},"title":"What if Elizabeth I had Died in 1562?","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is easy to take the long reign of Elizabeth I for granted. But less than four years after Elizabeth ascended the throne, her life was nearly cut short, threatening to bring down the curtain on the Tudor dynasty. What might have ensued is explored by Dr Andrew Thrush, editor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":9450,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/05\/31\/elizabeth-i-parliament-and-the-creation-of-new-peers-1558-1603\/","url_meta":{"origin":9606,"position":2},"title":"Elizabeth I, Parliament and the creation of new peers, 1558-1603","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"May 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Ahead of next Tuesday\u2019s Virtual\u00a0IHR Parliaments, Politics and People seminar, we hear from\u00a0Dr Andrew Thrush of the History of Parliament. On 7 June 2022, between 5.15 p.m. and 6.30 p.m., Andrew will be responding to your questions about\u00a0his pre-circulated paper on Elizabeth I, Parliament and the creation of new peers.\u00a0Andrew's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Conferences, Seminars and Events"","block_context":{"text":"Conferences, Seminars and Events","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/topics\/conferencesseminars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/npg_npg_541-001.jpg?fit=632%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/npg_npg_541-001.jpg?fit=632%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/npg_npg_541-001.jpg?fit=632%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":9236,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/04\/28\/the-execution-of-thomas-howard-4th-duke-of-norfolk\/","url_meta":{"origin":9606,"position":3},"title":"The execution of Thomas Howard, 4th duke of Norfolk","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"April 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"As the 450th anniversary of the execution of the Elizabethan duke of Norfolk approaches, Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of our Lords 1558-1603 section, considers both the background to his trial for treason and the queen\u2019s reluctance to carry out the sentence of the court \u2026 Shortly before seven in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/at-thomas-howard.jpg?fit=618%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/at-thomas-howard.jpg?fit=618%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/at-thomas-howard.jpg?fit=618%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":12600,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/12\/28\/henry-fitzalan\/","url_meta":{"origin":9606,"position":4},"title":"The man who would be king (-consort): Henry Fitzalan, earl of Arundel","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"December 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Many of the leading figures at the Elizabethan court, like the queen\u2019s chief minister, William Cecil, Lord Burghley and the royal favourite Robert Dudley, earl of Leicester, need no introduction. However, there were many other prominent men at the Elizabethan court, some of whom remain obscure even to Elizabethan historians.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/henry-fitzalan-12th-earl-of-arundel-hans-eworth-1550-berger-collection-denver-colorado.jpg?fit=1200%2C1194&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/henry-fitzalan-12th-earl-of-arundel-hans-eworth-1550-berger-collection-denver-colorado.jpg?fit=1200%2C1194&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/henry-fitzalan-12th-earl-of-arundel-hans-eworth-1550-berger-collection-denver-colorado.jpg?fit=1200%2C1194&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/henry-fitzalan-12th-earl-of-arundel-hans-eworth-1550-berger-collection-denver-colorado.jpg?fit=1200%2C1194&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/henry-fitzalan-12th-earl-of-arundel-hans-eworth-1550-berger-collection-denver-colorado.jpg?fit=1200%2C1194&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":8901,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/02\/24\/lady-katherine-grey-and-edward-seymour\/","url_meta":{"origin":9606,"position":5},"title":"Did they marry? Lady Katherine Grey and Edward Seymour, earl of Hertford","author":"Ben Coates","date":"February 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"For Elizabeth I\u2019s closest relatives, the process of finding a spouse could be fraught with difficulties, as Dr Ben Coates of our Lords 1558-1603 section explains\u2026 On 9 August 1561 Lady Katherine Grey, one of Elizabeth I\u2019s maids of honour, confided to her colleague, Elizabeth St Loe, that she was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/bc-earl-of-hertford.jpg?fit=961%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/bc-earl-of-hertford.jpg?fit=961%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/bc-earl-of-hertford.jpg?fit=961%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/bc-earl-of-hertford.jpg?fit=961%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/214198051"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9606"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14260,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9606\/revisions\/14260"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}