{"id":6702,"date":"2021-02-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-02-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=6702"},"modified":"2024-10-14T11:00:05","modified_gmt":"2024-10-14T10:00:05","slug":"second-battle-of-st-albans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2021\/02\/17\/second-battle-of-st-albans\/","title":{"rendered":"An empty victory: Queen Margaret and the second battle of St. Albans 17 Feb. 1461"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Today Dr Simon Payling<\/a> from our Commons 1461-1504<\/a> project marks the anniversary of the second battle of St. Albans. The battle may have been a convincing victory for the Lancastrian side, but was it a blessing in disguise for their Yorkist foes? <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Lancastrian victories of the civil war of 1459-61 have a curious quality.\u00a0Any victory in a campaign<\/a> that ends in defeat has the air of the pyrrhic about it; none the less, it is striking that after success at Ludford Bridge<\/a>, Wakefield<\/a> and St. Albans, the Lancastrians found themselves, on the eve of the decisive encounter at Towton<\/a> on 29 March 1461, on the defensive and with their King deposed. Certainly, the battle of Towton might have gone either way, but how was it that after the duke of York had been killed at Wakefield and the earl of Warwick defeated at St. Albans the Lancastrians found themselves playing no more than an even-money chance on that fateful day? The earl of March\u2019s victory on the Welsh Marches at Mortimer\u2019s Cross<\/a> a fortnight before the engagement at St. Albans is an important part of the answer, but so too is what happened at St. Albans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The facts of that campaign can be briefly set out. Fresh from victory at Wakefield, the Lancastrian army made its way south, plundering as it went, lavishing particular, but by no means exclusive, attention on the duke of York\u2019s property at Grantham and Stamford. The earl of Warwick, meanwhile, who had remained with the King in London after the duke of York had departed north to meet his death, made preparations to meet this threat.\u00a0The parliamentary session (the second of the assembly that had passed the Act of Accord<\/a> in the previous October), which had convened on 28 January, was prorogued after only a few days, and, on 12 February Warwick\u2019s army, hastily-assembled and with a high-proportion of ill-trained troops, set out on the road north.\u00a0He chose to take the King with him, perhaps believing, vainly as it transpired, that the royal presence in his own ranks would deter the Lancastrian army from fighting. One Yorkist chronicler echoed this reasoning, seeing evidence of the depravity of the Lancastrians in the fact that they came against the King \u2018his Baner displaied\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Queen Margaret of Anjou c. 1445 from British Library, Royal 15 E VI, f. 2v (presented to her by John Talbot, earl of Shrewsbury, on her betrothal to Henry VI) via Wikimedia Commons<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The battle itself was quickly won by the Lancastrians.\u00a0Warwick had chosen elaborately-defensive tactics, deploying his forces in an extended line with the town of St. Albans at its centre, but found himself surprised and outmanoeuvred by the speed and direction of the Lancastrian attack. The narrowness of the town\u2019s streets hampered the movement of his forces, and it may be that the Lancastrian victory came even before the main Yorkist forces had engaged. The escape from the field of Warwick himself and the other Yorkist leaders (with the exception of Warwick\u2019s brother, John, Lord Montagu, who was captured) is consistent with that conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From the Yorkist point of view, Warwick\u2019s escape was one blessing from that humiliating day, but there was another less immediately obvious. The Yorkists lost not only the battle but also the body of, in the words of Warwick\u2019s brother, George Neville, bishop of Exeter, \u2018that puppet of a King\u2019.\u00a0He was retaken by the Lancastrians, found, at least according to a report made to the dauphin of France, \u2018laughing and singing\u2019 under a tree.\u00a0This loss brought a new clarity of purpose to the Yorkist\u00a0cause. Had the King remained in their hands, there would have been those amongst the Yorkist leaders (and their sympathisers more broadly) who would have argued that the Act of Accord<\/a> should be maintained, with Henry VI as the nominal head of a Yorkist government.\u00a0Such a middle way would have offered a path to reconciliation with some at least of the Lancastrian leaders. The loss of the King ended this as a practical option.\u00a0Medieval government needed a King; the Yorkists had now lost him and with him the justification for their rule.\u00a0The solution was obvious: the new duke of York (and former earl of March) must take the throne.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just as losing Henry VI had some positive consequences for the Yorkists, regaining him was not the blessing it first appeared for the Lancastrians.\u00a0It may be going too far to say, as one modern commentator has done, that possession of Henry\u2019s person \u2018brought immediate military and political paralysis to the queen\u2019s hitherto successful forces \u2026 his presence inhibited action without his approval and his indecisiveness now infected the direction of affairs\u2019 (B.P. Wolffe, Henry VI (1981), p. 329). One may doubt that even his most loyal adherents would have placed much value on his views, particularly in relation to military matters. Yet his recapture may have partly informed the major miscalculation that followed the battle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Queen Margaret and her advisers chose not to exert every effort to take London.\u00a0They were undoubtedly faced with practical restraints in the achievement of that aim: they did not trust themselves to prevent their troops plundering the city and feared the reputational damage that would have done (one well-informed London chronicler remarked that \u00a0the Lancastrians withdrew because \u2018they demyde that the Northeryn men wolde have ben to creuelle in robbyng yf they hadde come to London\u2019); they were aware that, even though the city authorities were divided on the wisdom of admitting them, the city populace was fiercely hostile; and, perhaps most worryingly, they knew that the new duke of York was advancing towards London with the army that had won at Mortimer\u2019s Cross. Yet it may also be that the queen\u2019s determination to attempt to press the advantage was diminished by the retaking of her husband. She may have considered that this had fulfilled the principal purpose of her move south, and that his person, hapless as it was, would serve to rally the uncommitted to her cause.\u00a0As it transpired, however, the failure to take London was followed by the victorious entry of the duke of York and his acclamation as King on 4 March. Not surprisingly, one chronicler concluded that the Lancastrian retreat from London, \u2018was the destruction of King Henry and his queen\u2019. For the Lancastrians, St. Albans had, indeed, proved a pyrrhic victory; for the Yorkists, it had the appearance of a defeat but brought the consequences of a victory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

S.J.P<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Find more blogs depicting the events of battles within the Wars of the Roses here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today Dr Simon Payling from our Commons 1461-1504 project marks the anniversary of the second battle of St. Albans. The battle may have been a convincing victory for the Lancastrian side, but was it a blessing in disguise for their Yorkist foes? The Lancastrian victories of the civil war of 1459-61 have a curious quality.\u00a0Any victory in a campaign that ends in defeat has the … Continue reading An empty victory: Queen Margaret and the second battle of St. Albans 17 Feb. 1461<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":255143695,"featured_media":6704,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[687860035,189179080,774275682,81480,71470],"tags":[61709337,468448,35890,27525913,5417609,170177551,620930],"class_list":["post-6702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses","category-15th-century-history","category-henry-vi","category-medieval-history","category-military-history","tag-act-of-accord","tag-earl-of-warwick","tag-featured","tag-margaret-of-anjou","tag-queen-margaret","tag-second-battle-of-st-albans","tag-st-albans"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sp-second-battle-of-st-albans-margaret-of-anjou.jpg?fit=575%2C652&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-1K6","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":8110,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2021\/09\/23\/battle-of-blore-heath\/","url_meta":{"origin":6702,"position":0},"title":"\u2018He knewe the slaightes, stratagems, and the pollecies of warlike affaires\u2019: Richard Neville, earl of Salisbury, and the battle of Blore Heath","author":"Simon Payling","date":"September 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On 23 September 1459 the battle of Blore Heath took place. In today's blog, marking the anniversary of the battle, Dr Simon Payling from our Commons 1461-1504 project looks into the events of the encounter, as the earl of Salisbury's Yorkist forces faced up to those led by the Lancastrian\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/sp-blore-heath-audley-cross.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/sp-blore-heath-audley-cross.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/sp-blore-heath-audley-cross.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/sp-blore-heath-audley-cross.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/sp-blore-heath-audley-cross.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6411,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/12\/30\/battle-of-wakefield\/","url_meta":{"origin":6702,"position":1},"title":"Richard, duke of York\u2019s last Christmas: the Battle of Wakefield, 30 Dec. 1460","author":"Simon Payling","date":"December 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Today on the blog senior research fellow for our 1461-1504 project Dr Simon Payling regales us with Richard, duke of York's final Christmas and the Battle of Wakefield on 30 December 1460... 1460 saw some dramatic fluctuations in the fortunes of the house of York.\u00a0 At its beginning the Yorkist\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/wakefield-castle.jpg?fit=1100%2C736&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/wakefield-castle.jpg?fit=1100%2C736&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/wakefield-castle.jpg?fit=1100%2C736&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/wakefield-castle.jpg?fit=1100%2C736&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/wakefield-castle.jpg?fit=1100%2C736&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6800,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2021\/03\/04\/accession-of-edward-iv\/","url_meta":{"origin":6702,"position":2},"title":"A New Dawn? The accession of Edward IV on 4 March 1461","author":"Hannes Kleineke","date":"March 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On 4 March 1461 Edward duke of York was proclaimed King in Westminster Hall. But the authority of this new regime was not universally accepted. Dr Hannes Kleineke, editor of our Commons 1461-1504 project, continues our look at what some call the 'first' war of the roses, 1459-1461 and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "15th Century History"","block_context":{"text":"15th Century History","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/centuries\/15th-century-history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/york-and-lancaster-roses.png?fit=571%2C291&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/york-and-lancaster-roses.png?fit=571%2C291&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/york-and-lancaster-roses.png?fit=571%2C291&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4091,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/02\/03\/parhelion-the-earl-of-march-and-the-battle-of-mortimers-cross\/","url_meta":{"origin":6702,"position":3},"title":"Making the most of a parhelion: the earl of March and the battle of Mortimer\u2019s Cross","author":"Simon Payling","date":"February 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In our latest blog Dr Simon Payling, Senior Research Fellow for the\u00a0Commons 1461-1504 project, looks back to this date in 1461, when a natural phenomenon appeared to the future King Edward IV on the eve of battle... The battle of Mortimer\u2019s Cross has two claims to uniqueness among medieval British\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1089,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2015\/10\/29\/john-pennington\/","url_meta":{"origin":6702,"position":4},"title":"After Agincourt: the life of Sir John Pennington","author":"Simon Payling","date":"October 29, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"This past week we have been celebrating the 600th anniversary of the Battle of Agincourt (including the History of Parliament's 'A Band of Brothers' booklet on Parliament and the battle).\u00a0 Dr Simon Payling, Senior Fellow of the Commons 1422-1504 section, explores what happened next for one Agincourt veteran during uncertain\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13551,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/07\/30\/john-lord-clifford-killing-edmund-earl-of-rutland-battle-of-wakefield\/","url_meta":{"origin":6702,"position":5},"title":"John, Lord Clifford, \u2018the butcher\u2019 and the killing of Edmund, earl of Rutland, at the battle of Wakefield, 30 December 1460","author":"Simon Payling","date":"July 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the 15th Century, the killing of rival faction leaders were commonplace, especially throughout the Wars of the Roses. However, as Dr Simon Payling from our Commons 1461-1504 project investigates, one Lancastrian commander in particular garnered a reputation for brutality, going above the limits of accepted violence... The Wars of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/lord-rutland-killing.jpg?fit=645%2C792&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/lord-rutland-killing.jpg?fit=645%2C792&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/lord-rutland-killing.jpg?fit=645%2C792&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/255143695"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6702"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6702\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14672,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6702\/revisions\/14672"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}