{"id":19333,"date":"2026-01-05T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-05T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=19333"},"modified":"2026-01-05T09:18:51","modified_gmt":"2026-01-05T09:18:51","slug":"steps-towards-identifying-new-black-voters-in-18th-century-westminster-and-hertfordshire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2026\/01\/05\/steps-towards-identifying-new-black-voters-in-18th-century-westminster-and-hertfordshire\/","title":{"rendered":"Steps towards identifying new Black voters in 18th-century Westminster and Hertfordshire"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A few months ago, the History welcomed a guest post by Dr Gillian Williamson with her groundbreaking research into John London<\/a>, to date the earliest known Black voter in Britain, who lodged his vote in the 1749 by-election for Westminster. In this latest post, Dr Robin Eagles<\/a> explains the potential discovery of further Black voters taking part in the same contest and subsequent polls in Hertfordshire.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In July 1739, the General Evening Post<\/em> reported the death of a Mr Kent at his house near Seven Dials. According to the paper, Kent occupied the post of chimney sweeper of the king\u2019s palaces \u2018a place of considerable profit\u2019. Replacing him was one Mr Fatt and both men were described as \u2018Blackmoors\u2019 [an outdated term indicating Black heritage]. The role would have involved ensuring the upkeep of the chimneys at royal residences in London, such as St James\u2019s Palace. Intriguingly, Treasury accounts from 1714 suggest that the holder of the post at that time was Anne Fatt, suggesting that the family had held the role before, under Queen Anne, and had now regained it, under George II.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eighteenth and nineteenth-century commentators were often snide about chimney sweeps. The nature of their profession meant that they were frequently derided for being \u2018unclean\u2019, and this sometimes led to them being described as black, or depicted in prints with black skin. Consequently, some caution needs to be used when identifying a sweep\u2019s heritage. However, the fact that the paper used the specific term \u2018Blackmoor\u2019 seems indicative of the fact that this was not a case of people being dealt with slightingly because of perceived uncleanliness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the weekly essays in the Scots Magazine <\/em>for February 1740 noted the \u2018Promotion of Mr Fat [sic<\/em>] the Chimney-Sweeper\u2019, and also employed terminology describing his heritage directly, which appears to confirm the identification. Making reference to a vacancy in one of the Cornish boroughs, the author suggested that he hoped to see Fatt promoted to Parliament, before remarking that the presence of a Black Member of the Commons might give rise to racist abuse. [Scots Magazine<\/em>, ii. 56] A later essay, in the Oxford Magazine<\/em> for 1770, also referred to Fatt as the only \u2018Black-a-moor\u2019 ever to have held a place at Court. [The Oxford Magazine or Universal Museum<\/em>, v. 59]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The commentary surrounding Fatt\u2019s appointment offers valuable insights into attitudes to the Black population of Britain in the period. It is interesting that a potentially lucrative contract was held in succession by Black British businessmen; also, that Fatt\u2019s good fortune was the subject of comment in major periodicals. The reports help to add layers to our understanding of the composition of London society at the time. They show that members of the Black population were able to develop affluent careers, but also that their success was remarked upon, and not always favourably.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fatt\u2019s striking, if not wholly unusual, surname has also led to the likely identification of new voters. A decade after Fatt took over as sweep to the royal palaces, a by-election was held in Westminster after one of the constituency\u2019s Members, Granville Leveson Gower, Viscount Trentham<\/a> (later marquess of Stafford) accepted a place in government. Under the rules of the day, he was obliged to seek re-election, on this occasion triggering a contest after Sir George Vandeput, bt. chose to challenge for the seat. The initial result saw Trentham returned with 4,811 votes to Vandeput\u2019s 4,654. Following a scrutiny, the numbers were revised down but Trentham still emerged with 4,103 votes, comfortably ahead of Vandeput, who was left with 3,933 votes.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
(c) Trustees of the British Museum<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

According to the poll book<\/a>, one of those voting for Trentham was William Fatt, who was identified as a \u2018chimneysweeper\u2019 from Pye Street in the parish of St Margaret and St John. As such, he was one of five men involved in the trade (one of them noted as a Chimney Doctor, rather than sweep), voting in the election. Although more work is needed to confirm the finding without doubt, it seems highly credible that this was the same man who, ten years earlier, had taken on the role of sweeper of the royal palaces. Assuming this to be the case, he thus joined John London as a second Black voter participating in the election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fatt\u2019s name is not unique and unravelling the details of the family is complex. Two individuals, both named William Fatt, wrote wills in the 1770s, which were proved within three years of each other. It seems most likely that the first William Fatt, by then described as being of Castle Street, in St Giles in the Fields, whose will was proved in 1773 [TNA, PROB 11\/984], was the man appointed to sweep the royal palaces in 1739 and who voted in the 1749 poll, even though the document makes no mention of a trade. This William Fatt referred to a daughter, Mary Knotgrass, which calls to mind the appearance in legal records<\/a> from 1760 of William (a soot merchant from Swallow Street) and George Fatt (a victualler from Great Earl Street, Seven Dials), who stood bail of \u00a340 each for Peter and Mary Nodgrass [sic<\/em>]: possibly they were her brothers as William’s will mentioned four sons: William, George, Henry and Thomas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second William, almost certainly son of the elder William, died on 9 April 1776. He was buried in St Martin in the Fields, where a memorial was erected to him, his wife (Martha) and to sons-in-law, Thomas Angell (d<\/em>. 1780) and another named Freeman. His will gave his trade as a chimney sweep, indicating a continuation of the family business. [TNA, PROB 11\/1022] It referred to a house in Hampton, Middlesex, which he left to his daughter Mary, along with property at Sharrett (Sarratt) in Hertfordshire, which he left to another daughter, Anne. Both places also featured in the will of William the elder. Execution of the will was deputed jointly to Mary and to a carpenter from Piccadilly, named James Filewood, who received \u00a310 for his trouble. By coincidence, Filewood also featured in the 1749 Westminster poll book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Hertfordshire property seems to have offered both William (the younger) and George Fatt further opportunities to vote. Both names appear in the 1774 poll book for the county. William, noted again as resident of Swallow Street, but also a householder in Sarratt, voted for William Plumer<\/a> and Viscount Grimston<\/a>. George Fatt, noted of London, but claiming rights as a householder at Great Gaddesden, also voted for Grimston but, unlike William, gave his other vote to Thomas Halsey<\/a>. George Fatt then featured in the subsequent poll for the county in 1790. This time, he plumped for William Hale, who failed to be returned.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
(c) Trustees of the British Museum<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

That the family business endured beyond the lives of the two Williams is indicated by the existence of a trade card from 1780 describing George Fatt as son of William and continuing the sweeping business from Sweeper\u2019s Alley, Castle Street, Long Acre. It also noted that he had retained the role as sweeper to the king. George Fatt\u2019s success in doing so appears to have been in spite of the efforts of \u2018a great officer\u2019, who had attempted to install his own porter in the role on William\u2019s death. According to the press, \u2018P.D.\u2019 complained of the appointment of the man, who had been chosen in spite of knowing nothing of the business of chimney sweeping. [Morning Chronicle<\/em>, 19 Apr. 1776]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This brief snapshot into the successful establishment of a family business, by people of Black heritage, is just a minor glimpse into the lives of Londoners in the eighteenth century. More work needs to be done to determine beyond doubt the family\u2019s story. However, the findings suggest that there were many more people like them (and John London): successful business operators, who took the trouble to lodge their votes in eighteenth-century parliamentary elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

RDEE<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further Reading<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Benita Cullingford, British Chimney Sweeps: Five Centuries of Chimney Sweeping<\/em> (2001)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.londonlives.org<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ECPPEC<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A few months ago, the History welcomed a guest post by Dr Gillian Williamson with her groundbreaking research into John London, to date the earliest known Black voter in Britain, who lodged his vote in the 1749 by-election for Westminster. In this latest post, Dr Robin Eagles explains the potential discovery of further Black voters taking part in the same contest and subsequent polls in … Continue reading Steps towards identifying new Black voters in 18th-century Westminster and Hertfordshire<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":122411095,"featured_media":19341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[11942052,20918757,774275740,34931755,774275649,774275575,774275560,104933498,578856807,54004,785633],"tags":[774276123,113223,19229,35890,774275524,65986,14035393,50738,49246],"class_list":["post-19333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-history-of-parliament-trust","category-18th-century-history","category-constituencies","category-elections-2","category-george-ii","category-george-iii","category-georgian","category-georgian-elections","category-georgian-lords","category-local-history","category-queen-anne","tag-black-british-history","tag-black-history","tag-election","tag-featured","tag-georgian-lords","tag-house-of-commons","tag-poll-book","tag-voting","tag-westminster"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/mid_01571010_001.jpg?fit=777%2C1000&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-51P","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":13408,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/06\/26\/hustings-leadership-debates-18th-century\/","url_meta":{"origin":19333,"position":0},"title":"Hustings and leadership debates 18th-century style","author":"Robin Eagles","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Leadership debates, as experienced in modern elections, were not a feature of 18th-century contests. However, as Dr Robin Eagles shows in the latest post for the Georgian Elections Project, that does not mean that there was not plenty of opportunity for candidates to address their prospective constituents and be quizzed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Elections Project"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Elections Project","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-elections\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/download-2.png?fit=1200%2C611&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/download-2.png?fit=1200%2C611&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/download-2.png?fit=1200%2C611&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/download-2.png?fit=1200%2C611&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/download-2.png?fit=1200%2C611&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":13327,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/06\/14\/political-grandstanding-18th-century\/","url_meta":{"origin":19333,"position":1},"title":"Political Grandstanding in the 18th Century","author":"Robin Eagles","date":"June 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In an age of social media and immediate news coverage, publicity opportunities have become a central part of political strategy- particularly in the run up to a General Election. But even in the 18th century politicians looked for ways to generate attention when on the campaign trail. Dr Robin Eagles,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Elections Project"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Elections Project","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-elections\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/156319001.jpg?fit=1200%2C853&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/156319001.jpg?fit=1200%2C853&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/156319001.jpg?fit=1200%2C853&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/156319001.jpg?fit=1200%2C853&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/156319001.jpg?fit=1200%2C853&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":14739,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/10\/21\/john-london-first-black-voter\/","url_meta":{"origin":19333,"position":2},"title":"John London: Britain’s First Black Voter?","author":"History of Parliament","date":"October 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"At first glance, the 1749 Westminster constituency by-election does not seem to warrant too much attention, with the incumbent, Viscount Trentham, being re-elected following his appointment to office. However, as Dr Gillian Williamson explores, the election provides the earliest known record of a Black person voting in a British parliamentary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Lords"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Lords","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-lords\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Westminster-1747-1.png?fit=1096%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Westminster-1747-1.png?fit=1096%2C797&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Westminster-1747-1.png?fit=1096%2C797&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Westminster-1747-1.png?fit=1096%2C797&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Westminster-1747-1.png?fit=1096%2C797&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":13227,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/05\/31\/polling-advance-of-votes\/","url_meta":{"origin":19333,"position":3},"title":"Polling in advance of the votes","author":"Robin Eagles","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"As the 2024 General Election campaigns continue this week, news outlets have been filled with many different polls, suggesting a variety of possible election outcomes. But did you know that polling ahead of an election also took place in the 18th century? Dr Robin Eagles from our Lords 1715-1790 project\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Elections Project"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Elections Project","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-elections\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Oil portrait of a man from the waist up. He has a pale complexion and rosy cheeks, with a high forehead. He wears a long white wig tied in a black bow at the back. He is wearing metal armour over his right side, a white ruffled collar peeping out of it, as well as a blue sash. A red cloak is draped in the backgroud. ","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/charles_lennox_2nd_duke_of_richmond_by_circle_of_jean_marc_nattier.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":13342,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/06\/17\/london-poll-books\/","url_meta":{"origin":19333,"position":4},"title":"The ups and downs of a London election: examining London poll books","author":"Robin Eagles","date":"June 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"As pollsters look for constituencies across the country to act as representatives of how the wider nation may vote in the upcoming election, in the 18th century you might have looked to the capital city. Here Dr Robin Eagles explores how the City of London voted in two key elections\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Elections Project"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Elections Project","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-elections\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/82838001.jpg?fit=1200%2C866&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/82838001.jpg?fit=1200%2C866&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/82838001.jpg?fit=1200%2C866&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/82838001.jpg?fit=1200%2C866&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/82838001.jpg?fit=1200%2C866&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2489,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2018\/09\/06\/lady-chatham-and-the-1788-westminster-election\/","url_meta":{"origin":19333,"position":5},"title":"\u201cThe Cause of Decency against Indecency\u201d: Lady Chatham and the 1788 Westminster election","author":"History of Parliament","date":"September 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The latest post from the Georgian Lords features a guest blog by Dr Jacqueline Reiter, biographer of the 2nd earl of Chatham, on the role of the countess of Chatham in the notorious Westminster by-election held in the summer of 1788. On 12 July 1788, the London Gazette announced the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Lords"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Lords","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-lords\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Holding-Featured-Image-4.jpeg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Holding-Featured-Image-4.jpeg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Holding-Featured-Image-4.jpeg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Holding-Featured-Image-4.jpeg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Holding-Featured-Image-4.jpeg?fit=1200%2C658&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/122411095"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19333"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19333\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19436,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19333\/revisions\/19436"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}