{"id":19231,"date":"2025-12-17T08:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T08:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=19231"},"modified":"2025-12-04T11:18:48","modified_gmt":"2025-12-04T11:18:48","slug":"the-origin-of-the-wars-of-the-roses-the-marriage-of-richard-of-conisbrough-and-anne-mortimer-and-the-union-of-the-houses-of-york-and-mortimer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2025\/12\/17\/the-origin-of-the-wars-of-the-roses-the-marriage-of-richard-of-conisbrough-and-anne-mortimer-and-the-union-of-the-houses-of-york-and-mortimer\/","title":{"rendered":"The origin of the Wars of the Roses? The marriage of Richard of Conisbrough and Anne Mortimer and the union of the houses of York and Mortimer"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Whilst many see the ignition of the Wars of the Roses as taking place later in the 15th century, <\/em>Dr Simon Payling<\/a>, of our <\/i>1461-1504 section<\/a>, explores the impact of the marriage of Richard of Conisbrough and Anne Mortimer in 1408<\/i> and the consequences of their union…<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the study of medieval landholding, it is a common theme that an aristocratic marriage might have the most unpredictable of material consequences. A bride, with scant prospects of inheritance at her marriage, might, in her descendants, bring an unlooked-for windfall to the groom\u2019s family. It was, famously, such a match, made in the late 1410s, that brought the great Mowbray dukedom of Norfolk to their social inferiors, the Howards, some sixty years later. Of more general interest, however, are those matches that had profound political consequences, largely unanticipated or entirely disregarded when they were made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of these one of the most consequential is that of Edward III\u2019s grandson, Richard of Conisbrough, younger brother of Edward, duke of York, to that King\u2019s great-granddaughter, Anne, sister of Edmund Mortimer, earl of March. Even when it was completed in 1408, some at least must have been aware of its potential implications. If the cards of birth and death were to fall in a certain way, it would bring about two profound political changes. First, it would unite the lands of York and Mortimer and so create the largest aristocratic inheritance in the realm. Second, the beneficiary of that union would be the representative of two claims to the throne, the one in the male line from Edward III\u2019s fourth son, Richard\u2019s father, Edmund of Langley (d.1402), duke of York, and the other, much more importantly, from his second, Lionel of Antwerp (d.1368), duke of Clarence. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even in 1408, this convergence of lands and titles was a distinct possibility. Only one life, that of his brother, stood between the groom and the duchy of York, and, significantly, that life was unlikely to be perpetuated in issue. The duke had no issue by his wife, the twice-widowed Philippa Mohun, who was several years his senior, and it was clear that, unless she died and the duke remarried, his younger brother only needed to survive him to be his heir. The bride\u2019s prospects were less clear, but hardly remote. Only two lives, those of her unmarried brothers, Edmund and Roger, lay between her and a half share (with her sister) of the earldom of March. With the birth of a son, Richard, to the couple on 22 September 1411, there was a potential long-term beneficiary should the male line of the Mortimers fail, and, as seemed highly probable, the duke died childless. <\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/a>
Conisbrough Castle (2009), \u00a9Rob Bendall (Highfields)<\/a>, the birthplace of Edmund of Langley’s younger son, Richard<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

In these circumstances, a supporter of the house of Lancaster would not have been unduly pessimistic in predicting that the greatest aristocratic inheritance in the land would come into the hands of the representative of the Mortimer claimant. In 1399 the political nation had adjudged the seniority of that claim to that of the Lancastrian line of Edward III\u2019s third son, John of Gaunt, negated by a female descent (through Clarence\u2019s only child, Philippa, wife of an earlier Edmund Mortimer (d.1381), earl of March).  That judgment, however, was not beyond revocation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The marriage<\/a> thus posed obvious, albeit contingent, dangers to the house of Lancaster. The Mortimer claim had served as a rallying point for rebels against Henry IV\u2019s rule, most notably the Percy rising of 1403. Further, in February 1405, the hazard of a hostile alliance between the houses of York and Mortimer had been made evident when Richard\u2019s sister, Constance, Lady Despenser, abducted the two Mortimer boys from Windsor castle.  Her aim was to take them to their uncle, Sir Edmund Mortimer, an adherent of the Welsh rebel, Owain Glyn D\u0175r. It was fortunate for Henry, that the boys were quickly recaptured.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This raises an obvious question: how did a marriage so apparently pregnant with danger to the house of Lancaster come about?  It is likely that Richard met his future bride in 1404 when he was campaigning against Glyn D\u0175r, and she was at the Welsh castle of Powis in the custody of her mother, Eleanor, and stepfather, Edward, Lord Cherleton, one of the leading English commanders in Wales. When they married, they did so secretly, without the papal licence necessary to dispense them from the disability of consanguinity and without the reading of banns. As a result, they were excommunicated, but, on 23 May 1408, they secured papal absolution, and their marriage was confirmed. This secrecy may reflect the couple\u2019s awareness of the political sensitivity of their union, yet, secret or not, the need for a papal licence offered the opportunity for external intervention. If Henry IV had wished to intervene, that was the moment he might have lobbied at the papal curia against the granting of the licence.  <\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/a>
The tomb of Edmund duke of York and Isabella of Castile (d.1392) in the church of All Saints at King’s Langley (Hertfordshire). When the tomb was opened in 1877, it was found to contain a third internment, that of a young woman, who has been plausibly identified as Anne Mortimer. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

If this lack of apparent intervention suggests that Henry IV did not view the marriage as threatening, his son and successor, had a livelier appreciation of the dangers posed by the Mortimer claim. When Henry V acceded to the throne in 1413, the earl of March, the sole male representative of the main Mortimer line after the death of his younger brother, Roger, remained unmarried. Soon, however, he found himself a bride in Anne Stafford. She had the prospect of a great inheritance, for she was heiress-presumptive to her unmarried brother, Humphrey, later duke of Buckingham. The marriage, like that of Anne Mortimer, thus raised the possibility that two great aristocratic inheritances would be united in the hands of the Mortimer claimant. Henry V reacted with characteristic ruthlessness. On grounds of doubtful legality, he imposed a massive fine of 10,000 marks on the earl. The mystery is why the young earl was free to choose his own bride. He had been in royal wardship since 1398 and over the canonical age of consent since 1405. The Lancastrian regime may have calculated that the longer he remained unmarried, the greater the probability that he would die childless. The great fine may reflect the King\u2019s anger at the frustration of that hope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this context, Richard of Conisbrough\u2019s marriage is yet more surprising. If the extinction of the Mortimer line was the calculation, it was folly not to have prevented the marriage of his sister into the ducal house of York. What Henry V feared in the earl of March\u2019s marriage, namely an expanded landed inheritance in the hands of the Mortimer claimant, was already in prospect because of this earlier match. Indeed, it was this marriage that later turned this fear into reality, for the dynastic cards played out horribly unfavourably for the house of Lancaster. The childless deaths of the duke of York at the battle of Agincourt in 1415 and the earl of March in Ireland in 1425 brought about the union of lands and titles in the hands of son of the marriage between York and Mortimer.  From the dynastic viewpoint, another childless death was equally important.  Anne\u2019s sister, Eleanor, had, at about the time of her sister\u2019s marriage, married Sir Edward Courtenay, son and heir-apparent of the blind earl of Devon, but she died childless at some unknown date between 1414 and 1418.  Had she had male issue, that issue would have been coheir to the Mortimer inheritance with her infant nephew, the duke of York. The claim to the Crown would then have become divided and, as long as both these male lines survived, beyond realization. As this did not happen, the marriage of 1408, and the series of childless deaths that followed it, brought the grandson of that marriage, Edward IV, the claim to the throne he vindicated in 1461. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading <\/h3>\n\n\n\n

T.B. Pugh, Henry V and the Southampton Plot of 1415<\/em> (Southampton Record Series, 1988)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

J. Evans, \u2018Edmund of Langley and his Tomb\u2019, Archaeologia<\/em>, xlvi. 297-328. For more information on the tomb of Edmund duke of York and Isabella of Castile.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Whilst many see the ignition of the Wars of the Roses as taking place later in the 15th century, Dr Simon Payling, of our 1461-1504 section, explores the impact of the marriage of Richard of Conisbrough and Anne Mortimer in 1408 and the consequences of their union… In the study of medieval landholding, it is a common theme that an aristocratic marriage might have the … Continue reading The origin of the Wars of the Roses? The marriage of Richard of Conisbrough and Anne Mortimer and the union of the houses of York and Mortimer<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":255143695,"featured_media":19233,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[11942052],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-history-of-parliament-trust"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/ConisbroughCastle.jpg?fit=960%2C611&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-50b","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":12668,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/01\/23\/tomb-sir-richard-croft-and-eleanor-croft\/","url_meta":{"origin":19231,"position":0},"title":"The Tomb of Sir Richard and Eleanor Croft in Croft Church, Herefordshire","author":"Simon Payling","date":"January 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Sir Richard Croft's career spanned the entirety of the Wars of the Roses; he was able to adapt and maintain his prominence under each new political rule. Simon Payling\u00a0from our\u00a0Commons 1461-1504\u00a0project\u00a0takes a look at his remarkable career and his commemoration in Croft Church. The tomb of Sir Richard Croft, MP\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/picture2-croft.jpg?fit=978%2C733&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/picture2-croft.jpg?fit=978%2C733&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/picture2-croft.jpg?fit=978%2C733&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/picture2-croft.jpg?fit=978%2C733&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4969,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/06\/22\/anti-welsh-legislation-of-the-parliament-of-1401-and-the-battle-of-pilleth-on-22-june-1402\/","url_meta":{"origin":19231,"position":1},"title":"Anti-Welsh legislation of the Parliament of 1401 and the battle of Pilleth on 22 June 1402","author":"Simon Payling","date":"June 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In June 1402 English forces once again faced an uprising in Wales and on 22 June the two sides met at the battle of Pilleth. The result would have significant impact on the reign of Henry IV. Dr Simon Payling, senior research fellow in our Commons 1461-1504 project, recounts the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Medieval"","block_context":{"text":"Medieval","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/medieval-history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/pilleth-church.jpg?fit=887%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/pilleth-church.jpg?fit=887%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/pilleth-church.jpg?fit=887%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/pilleth-church.jpg?fit=887%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4091,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/02\/03\/parhelion-the-earl-of-march-and-the-battle-of-mortimers-cross\/","url_meta":{"origin":19231,"position":2},"title":"Making the most of a parhelion: the earl of March and the battle of Mortimer\u2019s Cross","author":"Simon Payling","date":"February 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In our latest blog Dr Simon Payling, Senior Research Fellow for the\u00a0Commons 1461-1504 project, looks back to this date in 1461, when a natural phenomenon appeared to the future King Edward IV on the eve of battle... The battle of Mortimer\u2019s Cross has two claims to uniqueness among medieval British\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/sun-dog-or-parhelion.jpg?fit=800%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2141,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2018\/01\/16\/women-and-parliament-in-the-fifteenth-century\/","url_meta":{"origin":19231,"position":3},"title":"Women and Parliament in the Fifteenth Century","author":"Simon Payling","date":"January 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"2018 is the centennial anniversary of the Representation of the People Act 1918 under the terms of which, for the first time in the history of the British Politics, some women were permitted to vote in Parliamentary elections. In order to mark this step in the progression of equality for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Medieval"","block_context":{"text":"Medieval","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/medieval-history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":16965,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2025\/05\/19\/devereuxs-of-weobley\/","url_meta":{"origin":19231,"position":4},"title":"A Yorkist Family during the Wars of the Roses: the Devereuxs of Weobley in Herefordshire","author":"Simon Payling","date":"May 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Dr Simon Payling, of our\u00a0Commons 1461-1504 section, explores the fortunes of one particularly loyal Yorkist family during the Wars of the Roses. For leading landowning families ready to commit themselves to one side or the other, the Wars of the Roses offered both hazard and opportunity. In terms of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/image-5.jpeg?fit=866%2C650&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/image-5.jpeg?fit=866%2C650&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/image-5.jpeg?fit=866%2C650&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/image-5.jpeg?fit=866%2C650&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":16603,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2025\/04\/10\/shropshire-church-of-kinlet\/","url_meta":{"origin":19231,"position":5},"title":"The story of a manor in memorials: the early tombs in the Shropshire church of Kinlet","author":"Simon Payling","date":"April 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Shropshire church of Kinlet stands isolated in parkland, the village it once served re-sited in the early-eighteenth century on the building of the still-extant Kinlet Hall. It contains a fine series of memorials, the two earliest of which mark the end of one Kinlet dynasty, the Cornwalls, and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/St_John_the_Baptist_church_Kinlet_-_effigy_of_Lady_Lychefield_-_geograph.org_.uk_-_3422575.jpg?fit=640%2C427&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/St_John_the_Baptist_church_Kinlet_-_effigy_of_Lady_Lychefield_-_geograph.org_.uk_-_3422575.jpg?fit=640%2C427&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/St_John_the_Baptist_church_Kinlet_-_effigy_of_Lady_Lychefield_-_geograph.org_.uk_-_3422575.jpg?fit=640%2C427&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/255143695"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19231"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19231\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19257,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19231\/revisions\/19257"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}