{"id":18476,"date":"2025-09-22T08:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-09-22T07:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=18476"},"modified":"2025-09-08T13:29:57","modified_gmt":"2025-09-08T12:29:57","slug":"parliament-and-politics-in-the-later-middle-ages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2025\/09\/22\/parliament-and-politics-in-the-later-middle-ages\/","title":{"rendered":"Parliament and Politics in the Later Middle Ages"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Dr Simon Payling<\/a>, of our 1461-1504 section<\/a>, tracks the development of Parliament and Politics in the Later Middle Ages, from its Anglo-Saxon roots to the more formal split between the House of Commons and House of Lords that we recognise today…<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

All long-lived institutions have their antecedents, and the antecedents of Parliament (or, perhaps more accurately put, the origins of the House of Lords) are to be found in the Anglo-Saxon witan which brought the leading men of the realm periodically together with the King for ceremonial, legislative and deliberative purposes.  In its earliest history \u2018Parliament\u2019, first used as a technical term in 1236, was a gathering of the same type, an assembly of prominent men, summoned at the will of the King once or twice a year, to deal with matters of state and law. It remained largely in that form for much of the thirteenth century. Occasionally, however, these assemblies were afforced by the summons of a wider grouping.  At first these extended assemblies \u2013 the first known dates from 1212 – served as a means by which the King could communicate with men who, although below the ranks of his leading tenants, were of standing in their localities and well-informed about local grievances. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Had the Crown been able to subsist financially upon its landed and feudal revenues alone, these representatives of the localities, the precursors of the Commons, might have remained, from its point of view, no more than conduits of information and recipients of instruction. The decline in the real value of its traditional revenues and the financial demands of war, however, transformed these local representatives from an occasional to a defining component of Parliament.\u00a0 Above all else, this was because the levy of taxation came to be understood as depending on their consent. The theoretical principle of consent had been stated in Magna Carta, but that consent was conceived, on the feudal principle, as residing exclusively in the King\u2019s leading subjects, his tenants-in-chief.\u00a0 But as the thirteenth century progressed this principle gave way to another, namely that consent must also be sought from the lesser tenants as the representatives of the localities.\u00a0 There was both a theoretical and practical reason for this: on the one hand, there was the influence of the Roman law doctrine, \u2018what touches all shall be approved \u00a0by all\u2019<\/em>, cited in the writs that summoned the 1295 Parliament; and, on the other, there was the practical consideration that the efficient collection of a levy on moveable property, the form that tax assumed, depended on some mechanism of local consent.\u00a0 Hence, from the 1260s, no general tax was levied without the consent of the representatives of local communities specifically summoned for the purpose of giving their consent, and only Parliaments in which the Crown sought no grant of taxation met without these representatives.\u00a0 The Crown\u2019s increasing need for money meant it was a short step to the Commons becoming an indispensable part of Parliament.\u00a0 After 1325 no Parliament met without their presence.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/a>
Edward I presiding over Parliament c. 1278 from the Wriothesley Garter Book of c. 1530:\u00a0 Royal Collection Trust, London, RCIN1047414<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

None the less, although this right of consent gave the Commons their place in Parliament, it did not give them any meaningful part in the formulation of royal policy.\u00a0 In so far as that policy was determined in Parliament, it was determined between the King and the Lords, who came to Parliament not through local election, as was the case with the Commons, but by personal writ of summons from the monarch.\u00a0 Further, the Commons\u2019 right of consent was as much an obligation as it was a privilege.\u00a0 Since subjects had a duty to support the Crown in the defence of the realm, the Commons had few grounds, even had they sought them, on which to deny royal requests for taxation. \u00a0What did, however, remain to them was some scope for negotiation.\u00a0 To make demands on his subjects\u2019 goods, the Crown had to demonstrate an exceptional need, a need generally arising from the costs of war; and, in making a judgment on the level of taxation warranted by this need, the Commons were drawn into a dialogue with the Crown over matters of policy, at least in so far as those matters \u00a0concerned expenditure.\u00a0 Hence the Crown had to measure its demands to avoid exciting criticism of its government.\u00a0 The consequences of its failure to do so are exemplified most clearly by the \u2018Good Parliament\u2019<\/a> of 1376, when the Commons, in seeking to legitimate the extreme step of refusing to grant direct taxation, alleged misgovernance, accusing certain courtiers of misappropriating royal revenue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aside from the granting of taxation, the other principal function of the medieval Parliament was legislative.  Even before the early Parliaments lawmaking was theoretically established as consensual between King and subjects, yet, in the reign of Edward I, legislation arose solely out of royal initiative and was drafted by royal counsellors and judges.  As the medieval period progressed, however, the assent of Parliament, first of the Lords and then of the Commons, became an indispensable part of the legislative process.  Here, however, the question was not, as in the case of taxation, simply one of parliamentary assent, it was also one of initiative.  New law came to be initiated not only by the Crown but also by the Commons.  In the early fourteenth century, in what was a natural elaboration of Parliament\u2019s role as the forum for the presentation of petitions of individuals and communities, the Commons began to present petitions in their own name, seeking remedies, not to individual wrongs, but to general administrative, economic and legal problems.  The King\u2019s answers to these petitions became the basis of new law. Even so, it should not be concluded from this important procedural change that Crown conceded its legislative freedom.  Not only could it deny the Commons\u2019 petitions, but, by the simple means of introducing its own bills among the common petitions, it could steer its own legislative program through the Commons.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

By the end of the medieval period, Parliament was, in both structure and function, the same assembly that opposed the Stuarts in the seventeenth century. It bargained with the Crown over taxation, formulated local grievances in such a way as to invite legislative remedy, and, on occasion, most notably in 1376, opposed the royal will. Yet <\/em>this is not to say that Parliament had yet achieved, or even sought, an independent part in the polity.  The power of the Lords resided not in their place in Parliament, but in the landed wealth of the great nobility.  For the Commons, a favourable answer to their petitions remained a matter of royal grace, yet they were under an obligation to grant taxation as necessity demanded (a necessity largely interpreted by the Crown); and their right of assent to new law was a theoretical rather than a practical restraint on the King\u2019s freedom of legislative action.  Indeed, Parliament amplified, rather than curtailed, royal power, at least when that power was exercised competently.  Not only were the Crown\u2019s financial resources expanded by the system of parliamentary taxation, so too was its legislative force and reach extended by the Commons\u2019 endorsement of the initiatives of a strong monarch, a fact strikingly demonstrated by the legislative break with Rome during the Reformation Parliament of 1529-36<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

S.J.P.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is a revised version of the article \u2018Parliament and politics before 1509\u2019 by Dr Simon Payling<\/a>,\u00a0originally posted on\u00a0historyofparliamentonline.org<\/a>.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr Simon Payling, of our 1461-1504 section, tracks the development of Parliament and Politics in the Later Middle Ages, from its Anglo-Saxon roots to the more formal split between the House of Commons and House of Lords that we recognise today… All long-lived institutions have their antecedents, and the antecedents of Parliament (or, perhaps more accurately put, the origins of the House of Lords) are … Continue reading Parliament and Politics in the Later Middle Ages<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":255143695,"featured_media":18478,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[81480,774275821,83191285,774275741],"tags":[35890,31184],"class_list":["post-18476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-medieval-history","category-13th-century-history","category-14th-century-history","category-parliamentary-life","tag-featured","tag-parliament"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Picture1-1.png?fit=470%2C700&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-4O0","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":957,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2015\/05\/14\/early-modern-ideas-about-parliaments-origins\/","url_meta":{"origin":18476,"position":0},"title":"Early Modern ideas about Parliament\u2019s origins","author":"History of Parliament","date":"May 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Our series celebrating the anniversaries of Magna Carta and Simon de Montfort\u2019s Parliament continues today. Dr Paul Cavill, Lecturer in Early Modern British History at Cambridge University discusses how the origins of Parliament were viewed in the early modern period\u2026 When did the first parliament in England meet? In modern\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Stuart"","block_context":{"text":"Stuart","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/stuart\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Drawing of Polydore Vergil","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/polidorovirgili.gif?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4490,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/04\/23\/ancient-britain-the-mother-of-parliaments\/","url_meta":{"origin":18476,"position":1},"title":"Ancient Britain, the Mother of Parliaments?","author":"Paul Seaward","date":"April 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"St George\u2019s Day seems an appropriate moment to invoke John Bright\u2019s famous, and much misunderstood, statement of 1865 that \u2018England is the Country of Parliament\u2026 England is the Mother of Parliaments\u2019. But to some in the seventeenth century and before, as British Academy and Wolfson Research Professor at the History\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Medieval"","block_context":{"text":"Medieval","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/medieval-history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/stonehenge-under-the-sunset-skies_800-1.jpg?fit=800%2C490&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/stonehenge-under-the-sunset-skies_800-1.jpg?fit=800%2C490&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/stonehenge-under-the-sunset-skies_800-1.jpg?fit=800%2C490&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/stonehenge-under-the-sunset-skies_800-1.jpg?fit=800%2C490&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":890,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2015\/03\/04\/parliament-in-the-north\/","url_meta":{"origin":18476,"position":2},"title":"Parliament in the North","author":"Hannes Kleineke","date":"March 4, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Yesterday, the Commons Speaker John Bercow suggested that MPs may have to move out of the House of Commons for extensive repair work to take place in the Palace of Westminster. Yet Parliament has not always been held in Westminster, or even London.\u00a0Dr Hannes Kleineke, Senior Research Fellow on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1893,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2017\/10\/11\/french-observers-of-the-early-eighteenth-century-british-parliament\/","url_meta":{"origin":18476,"position":3},"title":"\u201cA foreigner is therefore the most likely man to give an impartial account\u201d?: French observers of the early eighteenth-century British Parliament","author":"clittleton6c6ff85dd9","date":"October 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Published this week and edited by our own Dr Vivienne Larminie, Huguenot Networks, 1560\u20131780 The Interactions and Impact of a Protestant Minority in Europe includes new research on the Huguenot community and Parliament. In today\u2019s blog, Dr Charles Littleton discusses the phenomenon of the Huguenot Parliamentary reporter\u2026 Three hundred years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/georgian\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6727,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2021\/02\/22\/1951-and-the-birth-of-the-history-of-parliament\/","url_meta":{"origin":18476,"position":4},"title":"1951 and the Birth of the History of Parliament","author":"Paul Seaward","date":"February 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"This week the History of Parliament celebrates the 70th anniversary of one of many important dates in its history. To mark the occasion our director Dr Paul Seaward looks back to the beginnings of our project as we know it today. The History of Parliament has lots of birthdays, for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "History of Parliament Trust"","block_context":{"text":"History of Parliament Trust","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/history-of-parliament-trust\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/stf_nul_pac_183_88.jpg?fit=868%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/stf_nul_pac_183_88.jpg?fit=868%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/stf_nul_pac_183_88.jpg?fit=868%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/stf_nul_pac_183_88.jpg?fit=868%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":13181,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2024\/05\/28\/parliament-and-revolutionary-britain\/","url_meta":{"origin":18476,"position":5},"title":"Crisis? What Crisis? Parliament and Revolutionary Britain","author":"Alex Beeton","date":"May 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"At the end of April, the History of Parliament hosted a colloquium to celebrate the publication of the House of Commons 1640-60 volumes and the beginning of a new section on the Lords in the same period. In this blog, Dr Alex Beeton reports on a very successful day. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "17th Century history"","block_context":{"text":"17th Century history","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/centuries\/17th-century-history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/picture1.png?fit=849%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/picture1.png?fit=849%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/picture1.png?fit=849%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/picture1.png?fit=849%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/255143695"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18476"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18487,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18476\/revisions\/18487"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}