{"id":17600,"date":"2025-07-14T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-07-14T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=17600"},"modified":"2025-06-24T14:33:17","modified_gmt":"2025-06-24T13:33:17","slug":"francis-lord-deincourt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2025\/07\/14\/francis-lord-deincourt\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Good for nothing and lived like a hog\u2019: the destructive obsession of Francis, Lord Deincourt"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Dr Patrick Little<\/a> of the 1640-60 Lords section<\/a>, explores the strange life of a peer who valued money above everything<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It had started so well. Francis Leak, the son of Sir Francis Leak, a prosperous landowner in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, was the first of his family to try to establish himself on the national stage. He had already taken the important first step of marrying the sister of a rising star at court, Sir Henry Carey (later Viscount Falkland in the Scottish peerage). Yet Leak\u2019s ambitions were undermined by a fierce row with his father, who had resigned the patrimonial estate to him in return for a relatively high rent-charge. Once the documents were sealed, Leak refused point-blank to pay anything to his father, on the preposterous grounds of poverty. His true financial state was revealed in 1624, when he paid James I\u2019s favourite, George Villiers, 1st duke of Buckingham, \u00a38,000 to be made Baron Deincourt. The son\u2019s ennoblement enraged the father, who was already engaged in a lengthy legal battle with his son. Even the death of Sir Francis in 1626 did not stop the wrangling, as Deincourt\u2019s mother and half-brother disputed the will and won a chancery order for him to pay them rent arrears; this was upheld by the Lords in 1629. Deincourt\u2019s parliamentary service in the later 1620s had been overshadowed by this constant rowing, and the dispute continued into the early 1630s, ending only with the intervention of the privy council, which ruled against the baron. His reputation at court and among the aristocracy never recovered.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
George Villiers, 1st duke of Buckingham by Peter Paul Rubens, 1625. Accessed via Wikimedia Commons<\/a>. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Although Deincourt was treated with distain by the royal court during the 1630s, his son, also Francis, was able to succeed where the father had failed, joining the royal family for racing at Newmarket and being given minor ceremonial roles at court. His career was, however, spoiled by his father\u2019s parsimony. Two potential marriages were ruined by Deincourt\u2019s refusal to make realistic financial provision for his son, and by the end of the decade, Francis was languishing in debtors\u2019 prison. Deincourt was equally mean when it came to public affairs. Although a supporter of the king, he was reluctant to give the king money to fight the bishops\u2019 wars against the Scots in 1639-40, and he went on to play very little part in the Short and Long Parliaments. At the outbreak of civil war in 1642, he sided with the king. Francis, who had gone to France (possibly to avoid his creditors) died at about this time, leaving the second son, Nicholas, heir to the barony. Needless to say, Deincourt and Nicholas Leak immediately fell out, with Nicholas joining the parliamentarians.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Civil war did not improve Deincourt\u2019s miserliness. In September 1642, the prominent courtier, John Ashburnham, was sent to Deincourt to secure \u00a35,000 for the king, while Arthur Capell (later 1st Baron Capell), went on a parallel mission to the equally parsimonious Robert Pierrepont, 1st earl of Kingston-upon-Hull. The cunning Kingston deflected the request by suggesting the wealthy Deincourt \u2013 \u2018who was good for nothing and lived like a hog, not allowing himself necessaries\u2019 \u2013 could easily supply the money instead. Deincourt, who had \u2018so little correspondence with the court that he had never heard his name\u2019, did not accept Ashburnham\u2019s credentials until he had consulted with his wife\u2019s nephew, Lucius Carey, 2nd Viscount Falkland, but afterwards reacted \u2018with so different a respect\u2019 that the envoy became hopeful of receiving the money after all. He was soon \u2018undeceived\u2019:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The lord, with as cheerful a countenance as his could be (for he had a very unusual and unpleasant face), told him that though he had no money himself, but was in extreme want of it, he would tell him where he might have money enough \u2026 that he had a neighbour, who lived within four or five miles, the earl of Kingston, that never did good to anybody, and loved nobody but himself, who had a world of money, and could furnish the king with as much as he had need of. (Clarendon, <\/em>History of the Rebellion, ed. Macray, ii. 332-4)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Despite being something of a joke at royalist Oxford, Deincourt did serve the king faithfully, not least in the defence of Newark, and in sending two of his younger sons to serve in the king\u2019s army \u2013 both were killed in combat. He was made earl of Scarsdale at the end of 1645, probably in a deal in which he finally agreed to give material support to the king. At the end of the war, the new earl of Scarsdale refused to do a similar deal with Parliament. Unlike almost all peers who were given the option, he declined to compound for his estates, which continued to be sequestered. His heir, Nicholas Leak, who had managed to rent the Derbyshire properties from Parliament, now made a concerted effort to secure legal title to the whole estate, not least to ensure that his mother and the younger children were provided for. He finally succeeded in 1651.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
St Mary’s Church, Sutton Scarsdale, Derbyshire, via Wikimedia Commons<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Overriding Scarsdale\u2019s wishes was easy to justify, as his mental health appears to have deteriorated in the immediate aftermath of the first civil war, reaching a low point after the execution of Charles I in 1649, when \u2018he apparelled himself in sack-cloth, and causing his grave to be digged some years before his death, laid himself down in it every Friday, exercising himself frequently in divine meditations and prayers\u2019. (W. Dugdale, Baronage of England<\/em>, ii. 450). That this was not normal behaviour is underlined by the strangeness of earl\u2019s will, written in 1651. He gave unusually detailed instructions about his burial at Sutton Scarsdale church: he was not to be disembowelled or embalmed, and he was to be buried without a coffin, covered only by a sere-cloth or winding sheet, and \u2018a little round board of an inch think laid upon my face\u2019. (TNA, PROB11\/251, f. 139v). As if this was not odd enough, in the main body of the will the earl completely ignored the fact that the estate had effectively been taken out of his hands: his younger son, Henry, was provided with lands; his four unmarried daughters were given their full marriage portions of \u00a34,000 each; and, in a highly unusual move, these younger daughters were appointed executors. Reality reappeared only after the old man\u2019s death. When probate was passed in 1655, it was granted to Nicholas Leak, now 2nd Baron Deincourt and 2nd earl of Scarsdale, his sisters and widowed \u2018having renounced the execution of the said will\u2019. (PROB11\/251, f. 140)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PL<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The biography of Francis Leak will appear in the forthcoming House of Lords 1640-60<\/em> volumes; for his earlier career, see House of Lords 1604-29<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Biographies of Sir Henry Carey and Sir Francis Leak in House of Commons 1604-29<\/em>; George Villiers in House of Lords 1604-29<\/em>; John Ashburham, Arthur Capell and Lucius Carey in House of Commons 1640-60<\/em>; Nicholas Leak in House of Lords 1660-1715<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr Patrick Little of the 1640-60 Lords section, explores the strange life of a peer who valued money above everything. It had started so well. Francis Leak, the son of Sir Francis Leak, a prosperous landowner in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, was the first of his family to try to establish himself on the national stage. He had already taken the important first step of marrying … Continue reading \u2018Good for nothing and lived like a hog\u2019: the destructive obsession of Francis, Lord Deincourt<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":224818548,"featured_media":17602,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[754660295,7086711,774275574,774276112,40690,774275669,54004,71470,774275558],"tags":[774276141,35890,774276138,170904217,774276140,774276139,774276142,774276137,774276143,774276134,774276135,774276136],"class_list":["post-17600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-revolutionary-stuart-parliaments","category-17th-century-history","category-charles-i","category-corruption","category-economic-history","category-james-i","category-local-history","category-military-history","category-stuart","tag-arthur-capell","tag-featured","tag-francis-leak","tag-george-villiers-duke-of-buckingham","tag-john-ashburham","tag-lord-deincourt","tag-lucius-carey","tag-newark","tag-nicholas-leak","tag-sir-francis-leak","tag-sir-henry-carey","tag-sutton-scarsdale"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/image-4.png?fit=960%2C710&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-4zS","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3093,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2019\/04\/25\/sir-francis-knollys\/","url_meta":{"origin":17600,"position":0},"title":"Sir Francis Knollys: The Grand Old Man of the Long Parliament","author":"History of Parliament","date":"April 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"In earlier centuries politics might be seen as a young man\u2019s game, but here Dr Andrew Barclay of the House of Commons 1640-1660 section looks at a veteran Member of the 1640s who had first sat in the 1570s\u2026 MPs in the seventeenth century tended to be rather younger than\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "James I to Restoration"","block_context":{"text":"James I to Restoration","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/james-i-to-restoration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/sir-francis-knollys.jpg?fit=358%2C642&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2511,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2018\/09\/18\/electoral-patronage-of-anne-st-john-countess-of-rochester\/","url_meta":{"origin":17600,"position":1},"title":"Women behind the polls: the electoral patronage of Anne St John, countess of Rochester","author":"larminiev","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Earlier this month the History of Parliament Trust with partners UK Parliament's Vote 100 project and the Schools of Humanities at the University of Westminster held a conference to mark the centenary of the passing of the 1918 legislation that formally accorded women the right to sit in Parliament. It\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "James I to Restoration"","block_context":{"text":"James I to Restoration","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/james-i-to-restoration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2492,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2018\/08\/23\/parliament-and-medicine-17th-century\/","url_meta":{"origin":17600,"position":2},"title":"Parliament and medicine in the early 17th century","author":"Paul Hunneyball","date":"August 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Continuing the theme of health, medicine and Parliament, Dr Paul Hunneyball of the Lords 1604-29 Section considers how medical practices and language impacted on parliamentary proceedings under the early Stuarts\u2026 History of Parliament biographies contain many incidental details about medicine in the early 17th century, though the picture that emerges\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Stuart"","block_context":{"text":"Stuart","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/stuart\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/sir-william-paddy-marcus-gheeraerts-ii.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/sir-william-paddy-marcus-gheeraerts-ii.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/sir-william-paddy-marcus-gheeraerts-ii.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5989,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/11\/12\/none-can-sit-here-but-a-natural-liegeman-scots-at-westminster-in-the-jacobean-era\/","url_meta":{"origin":17600,"position":3},"title":"\u2018None can sit here but a natural liegeman\u2019: Scots at Westminster in the Jacobean era","author":"Paul Hunneyball","date":"November 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"As a prelude to this month\u2019s spotlight on politics in Scotland to mark St Andrew\u2019s Day, Dr Paul Hunneyball, assistant editor of the\u00a0House of Lords 1558-1603 project, examines one of the most sensitive questions in early 17th century politics \u2013 should Scots be allowed to sit in English parliaments?\u2026\u00a0 Historical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "James I to Restoration"","block_context":{"text":"James I to Restoration","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/james-i-to-restoration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/ludovic-stuart-duke-of-richmond-and-2nd-duke-of-lennox.jpg?fit=918%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/ludovic-stuart-duke-of-richmond-and-2nd-duke-of-lennox.jpg?fit=918%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/ludovic-stuart-duke-of-richmond-and-2nd-duke-of-lennox.jpg?fit=918%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/ludovic-stuart-duke-of-richmond-and-2nd-duke-of-lennox.jpg?fit=918%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":11967,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/09\/28\/caroline-court-breakdown\/","url_meta":{"origin":17600,"position":4},"title":"The Caroline court and the political breakdown of 1641-42","author":"History of Parliament","date":"September 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the latest Revolutionary Stuart Parliaments\u00a0blog, guest blogger Dr Fraser Dickinson considers the changes in the fortunes of the circles at the Caroline court as one of the reasons for the problems that Charles I faced during the crisis of 1641 and 1642. In the second half of the 1630s,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Revolutionary Stuart Parliaments"","block_context":{"text":"Revolutionary Stuart Parliaments","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/revolutionary-stuart-parliaments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/charles_i_and_henrietta_maria_met_dp823578.jpg?fit=1200%2C862&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/charles_i_and_henrietta_maria_met_dp823578.jpg?fit=1200%2C862&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/charles_i_and_henrietta_maria_met_dp823578.jpg?fit=1200%2C862&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/charles_i_and_henrietta_maria_met_dp823578.jpg?fit=1200%2C862&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/charles_i_and_henrietta_maria_met_dp823578.jpg?fit=1200%2C862&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7358,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2021\/05\/27\/representation-of-portsmouth-in-the-civil-wars\/","url_meta":{"origin":17600,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Better affected to Mars and Neptune, than to Mercury\u2019: docks, diversity and the representation of Portsmouth in the civil wars and interregnum","author":"larminiev","date":"May 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"In our latest blog Dr Vivienne Larminie, assistant editor of our Commons 1640-1660 project, continues our local history look at port constituencies. Today's focus is the naval city of Portsmouth, but were its maritime origins echoed in its 17th century parliamentary representation? The antiquarian and topographer William Camden characterised Portsmouth\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "James I to Restoration"","block_context":{"text":"James I to Restoration","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/james-i-to-restoration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/vl-portsmouth-henry-percy.jpg?fit=790%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/vl-portsmouth-henry-percy.jpg?fit=790%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/vl-portsmouth-henry-percy.jpg?fit=790%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/vl-portsmouth-henry-percy.jpg?fit=790%2C1000&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/224818548"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17600"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17600\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17611,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17600\/revisions\/17611"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17602"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}