{"id":15249,"date":"2025-01-06T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-01-06T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=15249"},"modified":"2025-08-19T14:01:21","modified_gmt":"2025-08-19T13:01:21","slug":"hugh-oldham","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2025\/01\/06\/hugh-oldham\/","title":{"rendered":"Hugh Oldham, bishop of Exeter, \u2018hath more poison in that grete fowle bely of hys then all the Bysshoppes in Englond\u2019: scandalum magnatum in early-sixteenth century England"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

For the first article of 2025, Dr Simon Payling<\/a> of our Commons 1461-1504 <\/a>Section, explores the use of a unique form of medieval defamation law in the early 16th century. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hugh Oldham (c.1450-1519), bishop of Exeter from 1505, has had a good press from historians. Described by the Exeter MP and chronicler, John Hooker alias Vowell (d. 1601), \u2018as a great favourer and a friend both to learning and to learned men’, he was a major benefactor of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, the foundation of his friend, Richard Foxe, bishop of Winchester. Although Hooker was no advocate of Oldham\u2019s own academic attainments, rather patronisingly remarking that he had \u2018more zeal than knowledge and more devotion than learning\u2019, he praised him for his friendliness. A curious action in the court of King\u2019s bench in 1512 gives a rather contrasting picture of the bishop, albeit one, as an ex parte statement, on which little reliance is to be placed.  When the bishop\u2019s servant, William Knot, came to Crediton to summon one of the clerks of the diocese, Edward Grigson, to appear in the consistory court, Grigson responded uncharitably, claiming that \u2018the Bysshoppe  of exet[er] is the most extorcyoner and poller that is in Englond for he hath extorcyoner and polled both me and my Tenauntez and that he hath more poison in that grete fowle bely of hys then all the Bysshoppes in Englond\u2019. A jury found for the bishop, and he was awarded the relatively modest sum of \u00a38 in costs and damages.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
Tomb of Hugh Oldham, Bishop of Exeter, Exeter Cathedral. Accessed via Wikimedia Commons. <\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The action was an innovative one.  Medieval statutes of scandalum magnatum, the first dating from 1275 and reenacted in almost the same terms in 1378 and 1389, had given peers and the King\u2019s great officers protection against the circulation of defamatory rumours about them. The purpose was political: as the 1378 enactment put it, such rumours created \u2018Debates and Discords\u2019 whereby, in the hyperbolic language of such statutes, the realm might be brought to \u2018quick Subversion and Destruction\u2019.  Despite this alarming danger, the statutes were rarely used until the first years of the sixteenth century, when lawyers began to wonder whether their peerage clients might use the offence of scandalum magnatum as a civil plea to win damages against those who could be accused of speaking ill of them. Their first recorded effort proved a failure. In 1495 Sir Richard Croft sought to forward a land dispute with Richard, Lord Beauchamp, by bringing an action under a statute which penalised the fabricating of false deeds. Beauchamp\u2019s response was to counter-sue for damages of \u00a31,000 on the eccentric claim that the allegation he had fabricated false deeds was itself an offence under the scandalum magnatum statute of 1378. This claim, which, if successful, would have given peers extensive protection against litigation, was quickly dismissed by the chief justice of the common pleas, Sir Thomas Bryan, who succinctly observed that the statutes of scandalum magnatum were \u2018not made to oust men of their legitimate actions\u2019.  Yet Bryan\u2019s ruling did not preclude the use of the statutes to sue for scandalous words.  There were a series of such actions in the common-law courts in early years of the sixteenth century.  The most famous of these was brought by Edward Stafford, duke of Buckingham, in the same year as Odiham\u2019s, against his former servant, Thomas Lucas of Inner Temple, former solicitor-general to Henry VII, for allegedly saying that \u2018he sett nott be the Duke two pens\u2019 and that the duke \u2018hath no more conseyens than a Dogg\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>
TNA, KB27\/1003, just. rot. 63<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

It would, however, be mistaken to see these actions solely in terms of the exploitation of aristocratic privilege under arcane medieval statutes, for they can also be seem as part of a more general development. Church courts had enjoyed a monopoly over cases of defamation, and, as in those courts the plaintiff could gain no damages beyond the imposition of penance upon the defendant, this was unsatisfactory. These actions of scandalum magnatum were only one attempt to redress this deficiency, for, at about the same time as they emerged, the common-law began to provide a general remedy with plaintiffs able to sue for damages for reputational damage caused by defamatory words.  Scandalum magnatum certainly gave peers a legislative advantage, one that was later to be ruthlessly exploited by the future James II in the early 1680s, but lesser men also had a common-law remedy for slander.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article on Hugh Oldham, bishop of Exeter, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

J.H. Baker, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, 1483-1558 <\/em>(2003), pp. 781-2, 797-8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

J.C. Lassiter, \u2018Defamation of Peers: the Rise and Decline of the Action of Scandalum Magnatum\u2019, American Journal of Legal History<\/em>, xxii (1978), pp. 216-36.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For the first article of 2025, Dr Simon Payling of our Commons 1461-1504 Section, explores the use of a unique form of medieval defamation law in the early 16th century. Hugh Oldham (c.1450-1519), bishop of Exeter from 1505, has had a good press from historians. Described by the Exeter MP and chronicler, John Hooker alias Vowell (d. 1601), \u2018as a great favourer and a friend … Continue reading Hugh Oldham, bishop of Exeter, \u2018hath more poison in that grete fowle bely of hys then all the Bysshoppes in Englond\u2019: scandalum magnatum in early-sixteenth century England<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":255143695,"featured_media":18438,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[687860035,103464271,362124,81480,48731],"tags":[35890,46977],"class_list":["post-15249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses","category-16th-century-history","category-legal-history","category-medieval-history","category-religious-history","tag-featured","tag-libel"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Tomb_of_Bishop_Oldham_in_Exeter_Cathedral.jpg?fit=3990%2C2776&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-3XX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":4588,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/05\/05\/the-true-queen-of-the-west\/","url_meta":{"origin":15249,"position":0},"title":"The true Queen of the West","author":"Hannes Kleineke","date":"May 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"May marks Local & Community History Month and kick-starts a new Local History blog series at the History of Parliament. Each month our researchers will explore the history of a constituency or an area across our different projects, and this week Dr Hannes Kleineke, editor of the Commons 1461-1504 section,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The Commons in the Wars of the Roses"","block_context":{"text":"The Commons in the Wars of the Roses","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-commons-in-the-wars-of-the-roses\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter_1563.jpg?fit=1200%2C949&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter_1563.jpg?fit=1200%2C949&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter_1563.jpg?fit=1200%2C949&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter_1563.jpg?fit=1200%2C949&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter_1563.jpg?fit=1200%2C949&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4633,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/05\/12\/exeter-and-parliament-1600-1660\/","url_meta":{"origin":15249,"position":1},"title":"Rights, Privileges and Just Liberty: Exeter and Parliament, 1600-1660","author":"Stephen Roberts","date":"May 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"In today's blog we return to our Local and Community History Month exploration of the historic constituency of Exeter. This week our director Dr Stephen Roberts looks at the city's 17th century representation and civil war religious divisions. Like their medieval predecessors, visitors to Exeter in the seventeenth century would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "James I to Restoration"","block_context":{"text":"James I to Restoration","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/james-i-to-restoration\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1597.jpg?fit=1200%2C824&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1597.jpg?fit=1200%2C824&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1597.jpg?fit=1200%2C824&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1597.jpg?fit=1200%2C824&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1597.jpg?fit=1200%2C824&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4674,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/05\/19\/our-london-exeter-and-the-glorious-revolution\/","url_meta":{"origin":15249,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Our London\u2019: Exeter and the Glorious Revolution","author":"Robin Eagles","date":"May 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"For the next instalment in our Local and Community History Month study of Exeter, Dr Robin Eagles, editor of the House of Lords 1715-90, explores the constituency during the Glorious Revolution of 1688. Despite the changes on the throne, Exeter's leaders were still concerned with familiar issues... In the 1690s\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Stuart"","block_context":{"text":"Stuart","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/stuart\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-cathedral.jpg?fit=800%2C587&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-cathedral.jpg?fit=800%2C587&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-cathedral.jpg?fit=800%2C587&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-cathedral.jpg?fit=800%2C587&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":12035,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/10\/05\/early-career-hugh-boulter-archbishop-of-armagh\/","url_meta":{"origin":15249,"position":3},"title":"The Early Career of Hugh Boulter, Archbishop of Armagh","author":"stuart03630ebada","date":"October 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the latest blog for the Georgian Lords, Dr Stuart Handley re-examines the early career of Hugh Boulter, briefly bishop of Bristol before being posted to Ireland, offering some corrections to his life story. Thomas Lindsay, archbishop of Armagh, died in the summer of 1724, after a long illness. Although\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Georgian Lords"","block_context":{"text":"Georgian Lords","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/georgian-lords\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/bst_bmagg_k471-001.jpg?fit=954%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/bst_bmagg_k471-001.jpg?fit=954%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/bst_bmagg_k471-001.jpg?fit=954%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/bst_bmagg_k471-001.jpg?fit=954%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4427,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/04\/14\/social-distancing-medieval-style-a-petition-from-the-commons-in-the-parliament-of-1439\/","url_meta":{"origin":15249,"position":4},"title":"Social Distancing – Medieval Style: a Petition of the Commons in the Parliament of 1439","author":"Hannes Kleineke","date":"April 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"As discussions turn to how Parliament should operate during the Covid-19 pandemic, Dr Hannes Kleineke, editor of our 1461-1504 section, looks at the parliament of 1439. When Henry VI reluctantly called Parliament back to Westminster during the 'Black Death', MPs had just one request... If the efforts to control the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Medieval"","block_context":{"text":"Medieval","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/periods\/medieval-history\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/king_henry_vi_from_npg_2.jpg?fit=939%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/king_henry_vi_from_npg_2.jpg?fit=939%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/king_henry_vi_from_npg_2.jpg?fit=939%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/king_henry_vi_from_npg_2.jpg?fit=939%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4749,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/05\/27\/parliamentary-reform-and-its-impact-on-exeter-1820-1868\/","url_meta":{"origin":15249,"position":5},"title":"\u2018The power of returning our members will henceforth be in our own hands\u2019: parliamentary reform and its impact on Exeter, 1820-1868","author":"Martin Spychal","date":"May 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Dr Martin Spychal, research fellow for the Commons 1832-68, uses polling and voter registration data to explore the 1832 Reform Act\u2019s impact on elections in Exeter.","rel":"","context":"In "Victorian Commons"","block_context":{"text":"Victorian Commons","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/victorian-commons\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1831-pro-reform-poster-sepia.jpg?fit=745%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1831-pro-reform-poster-sepia.jpg?fit=745%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1831-pro-reform-poster-sepia.jpg?fit=745%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/exeter-1831-pro-reform-poster-sepia.jpg?fit=745%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/255143695"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15249"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15249\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18440,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15249\/revisions\/18440"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18438"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}