{"id":12600,"date":"2023-12-28T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-12-28T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/?p=12600"},"modified":"2024-09-24T13:36:32","modified_gmt":"2024-09-24T12:36:32","slug":"henry-fitzalan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/12\/28\/henry-fitzalan\/","title":{"rendered":"The man who would be king (-consort): Henry Fitzalan, earl of Arundel"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Many of the leading figures at the Elizabethan court, like the queen\u2019s chief minister, William Cecil, Lord Burghley and the royal favourite Robert Dudley, earl of Leicester, need no introduction. However, there were many other prominent men at the Elizabethan court, some of whom remain obscure even to Elizabethan historians. In the following blog, Dr Andrew Thrush<\/a>, the editor of our House of Lords 1558-1603 section<\/a>, turns the spotlight on the little-known Henry Fitzalan, earl of Arundel, whose papers have regrettably long since vanished…<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The last of the Fitzalans, Earl Henry was a member of one of the oldest aristocratic dynasties in England. Indeed, his family had held the earldom of Arundel since the early thirteenth century. He was also extremely wealthy, having a large estate in Sussex, with other lands scattered throughout southern England. Born in 1512, three years after the accession of Henry VIII, Arundel first achieved high office in 1546, when he was appointed lord chamberlain. However, it was under Mary I that he attained a position of great prominence, as Mary, thankful for his support against Lady Jane Grey, promoted him to lord steward and also made him lord president of the Privy Council.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/a>
Henry Fitzalan, earl of Arundel in ‘antique’ dress (Hans Eworth, 1550; Berger Collection, Denver, Colorado)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Seniority of rank was no guide to ability, of course. Contemporary observers regarded Arundel as a light-weight. The Imperial ambassador, for example, thought him \u2018silly\u2019, while Spanish diplomats considered him \u2018flighty\u2019 and \u2018weak\u2019. He was certainly unable to control his temper and did not like to be contradicted. On one occasion early in Elizabeth I\u2019s reign he and the lord admiral, Lord Clinton, quarrelled so vehemently that they \u2018fell to fisticuffs and grabbing each other\u2019s beards\u2019, to the considerable embarrassment of the queen, who witnessed this childish behaviour. However, it would be a mistake to write off Arundel as inconsequential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite his character flaws, Arundel was an important figure at the Elizabethan court because he was regarded as potentially dangerous. His wealth and landed estate made him powerful. So too did his connections: until recently he had been father-in-law to the queen\u2019s cousin, Thomas Howard, 4th duke of Norfolk, England\u2019s premier peer. There was also the fact that, like many members of the ancient nobility, Arundel clung to the Catholic faith. Unless handled carefully, he might easily become a rallying point for disaffected members of the nobility and gentry alike. He was certainly a popular figure. When, in April 1567, he travelled to London through Kent, having spent some time in northern Italy, he was accompanied by six or seven hundred members of the gentry of Kent, Surrey and Sussex. By the time he reached the capital, his entourage had reportedly swollen to more than 2,000, including many of London\u2019s aldermen and several of his fellow nobles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From the very start of her reign, Elizabeth had the good sense to treat Arundel with kid gloves. When Arundel, then one of the commissioners entrusted with the task of negotiating a peace with France, returned to England without her permission in late 1559, Elizabeth neither upbraided him nor sent him back. On the contrary, she let his presumption go unpunished and instead confirmed him in office as lord steward. She also allowed him to retain his seat on the Privy Council, whereas four other Catholics lost theirs, among them Arundel\u2019s Sussex neighbour, Viscount Montagu. Moreover, she allowed Arundel to play a central role in her coronation, appointing him lord high steward and constable of England for the occasion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One reason Elizabeth trod so carefully was that she could not afford to alienate such a powerful Catholic peer before she secured parliamentary approval for the restoration of the royal supremacy and the Protestant faith. Arundel might otherwise serve as the focus of Catholic opposition in the Lords. This consideration probably explains why, before Parliament met, Elizabeth encouraged Arundel to believe that she might marry him, despite the more than twenty-year difference in their ages. The earl was completely taken in by this deception, and showered the queen\u2019s ladies-in-waiting with jewels in the hope that they would further his suit. A few weeks after Parliament assembled in January 1559, Arundel made himself scarce, pleading illness, presumably to avoid incurring the queen\u2019s displeasure, as he would have found it difficult to avoid allying himself in Parliament with fellow Catholic peers opposed to the reintroduction of Protestantism. Although he resumed his seat some weeks later, he quickly withdrew again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arundel seems to have been slow to discover that he had been deceived. As late as August 1559, in a bold attempt to win the queen\u2019s hand, he lavishly entertained the queen at Nonsuch, the former royal palace he had bought from Queen Mary. However, the following year he learned that Elizabeth was amorously involved with Lord Robert Dudley<\/a>. Thereafter, he proved to be something of a thorn in the queen\u2019s side, though it soon became clear that he was less dangerous than was at first feared.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"A<\/a>
The earl of Arundel in 1565 (unknown artist; National Portrait Gallery)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Arundel, in fact, was his own worst enemy. In July 1564 he lost his temper with the queen and surrendered his staff of office, for which offence he was placed under house arrest for the next five months. He thereby deprived himself of his key position at court. Sullen and resentful, he spent the next few years trying to avoid matters of state. However, he returned to the fray in 1569, when he and the duke of Norfolk began plotting with the Spanish ambassador to overthrow the queen\u2019s chief minister, William Cecil<\/a>, whom they blamed for Elizabeth\u2019s hostility to her heir apparent, Mary, Queen of Scots. Arundel saw in Mary, by now Elizabeth\u2019s prisoner, the best chance of restoring England to the Catholic faith. However, neither he nor Norfolk was ever able to deliver the coup they promised as they proved unable to win over Dudley, now earl of Leicester.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The following year Arundel became implicated in a plot to marry Norfolk to Mary, which Elizabeth considered treasonable. Indeed, according to Norfolk, the plan actually originated with Arundel. As a result, Arundel was once again placed under restraint, and only released in April 1570, after the suppression of the rebellion of the Northern Earls, the first serious Catholic conspiracy of the reign. Between September 1571 and December 1572 he was again imprisoned, this time in the Tower of London, after it was discovered that he was closely involved in the Ridolfi Plot, a Spanish-backed scheme which aimed to overthrow Elizabeth and replace her with Mary, Queen of Scots. However, his life, unlike Norfolk\u2019s, was spared as it was clearly Norfolk who posed the major threat. Following his release, Arundel was permitted to resume his seat on the Council. This was a surprising decision, perhaps, but as Dr Neil Younger has recently shown, the Elizabethan Privy Council was never the sole preserve of Protestants but included many Catholics and crypto-Catholics, among them the well-known Sir Christopher Hatton. Besides, it may have been expected that Arundel would not live much longer as by then he was in poor health. In fact, he did not die until February 1580, whereupon his lands and titles descended to Philip Howard, the eldest son of his fellow conspirator, the late duke of Norfolk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ADT<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further reading:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Neil Younger, \u2018How Protestant was the Elizabethan Regime?\u2019, <\/em>English Historical Review, vol. 133 (2018)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stephen Alford<\/em>, The Early Elizabethan Polity (1998)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wallace MacCaffrey<\/em>, The Shaping of the Elizabethan Regime (1969)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Many of the leading figures at the Elizabethan court, like the queen\u2019s chief minister, William Cecil, Lord Burghley and the royal favourite Robert Dudley, earl of Leicester, need no introduction. However, there were many other prominent men at the Elizabethan court, some of whom remain obscure even to Elizabethan historians. In the following blog, Dr Andrew Thrush, the editor of our House of Lords 1558-1603 … Continue reading The man who would be king (-consort): Henry Fitzalan, earl of Arundel<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":214198051,"featured_media":12608,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[720013330,103464271,774275564,774275534],"tags":[644040,35890,664912262,62562235,1242981,20806920,66533311,40083150,748079134,123735354],"class_list":["post-12600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-first-elizabethan-age","category-16th-century-history","category-elizabeth-i","category-tudor","tag-elizabeth-i","tag-featured","tag-henry-fitzalan-earl-of-arundel","tag-lord-steward","tag-mary-queen-of-scots","tag-nonsuch-palace","tag-ridolfi-plot","tag-robert-dudley-earl-of-leicester","tag-thomas-howard-4th-duke-of-nortfolk","tag-william-cecil-lord-burghley"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/henry-fitzalan-12th-earl-of-arundel-hans-eworth-1550-berger-collection-denver-colorado.jpg?fit=1616%2C1608&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QYNW-3he","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10812,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/02\/23\/other-elizabethan-succession-crisis-1st-lord-burghley\/","url_meta":{"origin":12600,"position":0},"title":"The other Elizabethan succession crisis: the fight to succeed the 1st Lord Burghley, 1592-1598","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"February 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The long-running problem of who would inherit the English throne was not the only succession crisis of Elizabeth I\u2019s reign. In the first of our series of blogs on faction in English politics, Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of the House of Lords 1558-1603 project, explores the bitter rivalry between the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/robert_cecil_1st_earl_of_salisbury_by_john_de_critz_the_elder_npg.jpg?fit=974%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/robert_cecil_1st_earl_of_salisbury_by_john_de_critz_the_elder_npg.jpg?fit=974%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/robert_cecil_1st_earl_of_salisbury_by_john_de_critz_the_elder_npg.jpg?fit=974%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/robert_cecil_1st_earl_of_salisbury_by_john_de_critz_the_elder_npg.jpg?fit=974%2C1200&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":9450,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/05\/31\/elizabeth-i-parliament-and-the-creation-of-new-peers-1558-1603\/","url_meta":{"origin":12600,"position":1},"title":"Elizabeth I, Parliament and the creation of new peers, 1558-1603","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"May 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Ahead of next Tuesday\u2019s Virtual\u00a0IHR Parliaments, Politics and People seminar, we hear from\u00a0Dr Andrew Thrush of the History of Parliament. On 7 June 2022, between 5.15 p.m. and 6.30 p.m., Andrew will be responding to your questions about\u00a0his pre-circulated paper on Elizabeth I, Parliament and the creation of new peers.\u00a0Andrew's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Conferences, Seminars and Events"","block_context":{"text":"Conferences, Seminars and Events","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/topics\/conferencesseminars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/npg_npg_541-001.jpg?fit=632%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/npg_npg_541-001.jpg?fit=632%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/npg_npg_541-001.jpg?fit=632%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":9236,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2022\/04\/28\/the-execution-of-thomas-howard-4th-duke-of-norfolk\/","url_meta":{"origin":12600,"position":2},"title":"The execution of Thomas Howard, 4th duke of Norfolk","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"April 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"As the 450th anniversary of the execution of the Elizabethan duke of Norfolk approaches, Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of our Lords 1558-1603 section, considers both the background to his trial for treason and the queen\u2019s reluctance to carry out the sentence of the court \u2026 Shortly before seven in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/at-thomas-howard.jpg?fit=618%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/at-thomas-howard.jpg?fit=618%2C800&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/at-thomas-howard.jpg?fit=618%2C800&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4080,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2020\/01\/30\/new-elizabethan-house-of-lords-project\/","url_meta":{"origin":12600,"position":3},"title":"New project: the Elizabethan House of Lords","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"January 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"A new year at the History of Parliament Trust sees the start of a new project. Research on the House of Lords 1558-1603 will complement our Commons project during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I by exploring the members of the upper chamber. Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of the project,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/elizabeth-i-coronation-robes-e1580392255356.jpg?fit=707%2C696&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/elizabeth-i-coronation-robes-e1580392255356.jpg?fit=707%2C696&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/elizabeth-i-coronation-robes-e1580392255356.jpg?fit=707%2C696&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/elizabeth-i-coronation-robes-e1580392255356.jpg?fit=707%2C696&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":11847,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2023\/08\/24\/what-if-elizabeth-i-had-died-in-1562\/","url_meta":{"origin":12600,"position":4},"title":"What if Elizabeth I had Died in 1562?","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It is easy to take the long reign of Elizabeth I for granted. But less than four years after Elizabeth ascended the throne, her life was nearly cut short, threatening to bring down the curtain on the Tudor dynasty. What might have ensued is explored by Dr Andrew Thrush, editor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/painting-of-lady-katherine-grey.jpg?fit=1200%2C1186&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7763,"url":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/2021\/08\/10\/henry-howard-earl-of-northampton\/","url_meta":{"origin":12600,"position":5},"title":"The Great Survivor: Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton, 1540-1614","author":"Andrew Thrush","date":"August 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"In today's blog we hear from Dr Andrew Thrush, editor of our Lords 1558-1603 project, on the elusive career of Henry Howard, earl of Northampton. Howard's shrewd political manoeuvres allowed him to evade attention from government officials throughout his career and often evade attention from historians- until now! In medieval\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "The First Elizabethan Age"","block_context":{"text":"The First Elizabethan Age","link":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/category\/sections\/the-first-elizabethan-age\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/at-henry_howard_earl_of_northampton-july-2021.jpg?fit=656%2C954&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/at-henry_howard_earl_of_northampton-july-2021.jpg?fit=656%2C954&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/at-henry_howard_earl_of_northampton-july-2021.jpg?fit=656%2C954&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/214198051"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12600"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12600\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12614,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12600\/revisions\/12614"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12608"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historyofparliament.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}